RentaDays Company Profile: Airbnb Reviews, Listings & Performance in Santiago de Chille
Data note: These figures are estimates based on Airbtics' tracked Airbnb and short-term rental data. Actual occupancy, ADR, revenue, and listing counts may differ from a company's internal PMS or owner reports. We have refined this methodology over 6 years and use our best effort to keep the data accurate and useful.
RentaDays Airbnb Listings in Santiago de Chille
Locations of 71 RentaDays short-term rentals tracked in Santiago de Chille. Hover a pin to see its average daily rate and size.
How Do RentaDays Listings Compare to the Average Santiago de Chille Airbnb Market Performance?
To make an informed decision whether RentaDays is the best Airbnb property manager for your
Santiago de Chille short-term rental, it’s important to compare its listings performance with
the average metrics for the market. Airbtics data-driven analysis covers average daily rate (ADR),
occupancy rate, annual revenue, and more to help you.
Whether you’re an established vacation rental investor or a beginner host, find out if RentaDays is
the best choice for your Airbnb business.
| Average Daily Rate (ADR) | Occupancy Rate | Average Annual Revenue | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RentaDays | CLP44,498 | 58% | CLP4,265,198 |
| Santiago de Chille (Market average) | CLP48,285 | 62% | CLP10,759,094 |
| Competitive Positioning | -8% | -6% | -60% |
Note: Average annual revenue is the mean per listing over the last 12 months, based on each listing's active days, occupancy, ADR, and cleaning fees. It is not calculated as ADR × 365 × occupancy rate.
Top alternatives to RentaDays
Compare other verified managers in Santiago de Chille, or browse the full Santiago de Chille Airbnb management companies list.
| Alternative manager | Listings | Rating | Occupancy | ADR | Revenue/listing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andes STR | 247 | 4.6 | 73% | CLP66,273 | CLP10,807,379 |
| HomChile | 239 | 4.9 | 57% | CLP58,699 | CLP7,327,999 |
| HomeTravellers | 58 | 4.6 | 51% | CLP62,486 | CLP6,895,325 |
RentaDays Airbnb Guest Reviews
RentaDays has an average rating on Airbnb of 4.7. This Airbnb rating shows that RentaDays consistently delivers excellent property management services, ensuring strong guest satisfaction and trust.
Explore vacation rental manager analytics on Airbtics
You can access detailed analytics on vacation rental managers, including their KPIs and their listings’ historical performance, on the Airbtics platform. Top operators use this data for benchmarking and to stay ahead of the market.
RentaDays Growth: 222.73% More Airbnb Listings Under Management YoY
Over the last 12 months, RentaDays has increased the number of short-term rentals it manages by 222.73%. This expansion indicates growing demand and a strong market presence. 🏖️
RentaDays Airbnb Management Fees
The average Santiago de Chille Airbnb property manager charges 10-15% of short-term rental income for
half-service management and 20-30% for full-service management. Premium Santiago de Chille Airbnb
management companies charge up to 40-45% of the booking total. The exact rate depends on your exact
location, property type and size, and required vacation rental management services.
To get a custom quote from RentaDays about their Airbnb management fees, get in touch with the
team.
Is RentaDays a Good Airbnb Property Manager Option in Santiago de Chille?
Considering RentaDays property management services, fees, and performance vs market average, it
could be a good option for some Airbnb hosts and owners looking for passive short-term rental
property investments in Santiago de Chille.
To decide if RentaDays is the best choice for you, take into account the costs and benefits.
Evaluate whether the expected boost in rental revenue due to professional services and the elevated
level of comfort for you exceed or not the monthly Airbnb management fees charged by RentaDays.
It’s best to schedule a call with RentaDays to discuss your particular situation, what the Airbnb
manager can do for your property, and how much exactly you’d need to pay them.